Scholar Sujit Choudhry

Sujit Choudhry, a professor researches issues that contain the matters of constitutional law and politics. Apart of these topics are constitutional crime which is a peaceful transition from violence conflict to non-violent conflict, constitutions for ethnically created communities, laws regarding the courts, official language policy and minority rights to just name a few ( constitutionaltransitions.org).

Sujit Choudhry most recent book publication discusses these topics amongst political leaders. In one of the chapters of his book, he talks about a tweet from the former attorney general under President Obama. The chapter discusses the topic of constitutional self-enforcement. Sujit Choudhry calls this self-enforcement because the attorney general message’s is based around a focal point. The focal point his tweet was centered around was one of the American people to be able to decide if a political leader has broken a law and what should be the consequence of his action (releasefact.com)

Another focal point Sujit Choudhry’s book discusses is how presidential terms throughout the world have a term limit. The presidential term limit in the United States is two. The professor’s book talks about an autocrat would want to break this term limit aiming to remain in office for a longer amount of time. By doing this, the person would be breaking a focal point or constitutional law.

Sujit Choudhry discusses in ample amounts the deterioration of the political climate around him. His book discusses how media has alluded to how things constitutionally globally are beginning to fail. He talks about Poland’s constitutional focal points. Recently, the rules of governing the country has changed, voting is not the way it use to be, Interim Presidents are being created and a new way of selecting judges over courts have steered away from former focal points to new ones.

Sujit Choudhry is an excellent professor who thoroughly researches his subjects that he writes commentary for. His commentary highlights changes in the constitutional law around the world. He brings up the topic of democracy and how focal points influence people’s democracy. His publication includes over ninety articles, book reports and chapters regarding constitutional ideas, societies and public law, check works.bepress.com.

 

 

Sujit Choudhry is Featured in a New Book where he Discusses Eric Holder

Sujit Choudhry is a former law clerk, university dean, and professor. Despite his long list of accolades, Sujit is best known for his time spent as a constitutional adviser. Sujit traveled the world, helping world leaders and setting up democratic constitutions. Sujit Choudhry advised world leaders on subjects such as official language policy, secession, and federalism, see constitutionaltransitions.org.

Sujit is also an author, providing his work to books and journals such as The Migration of Constitutional Ideas and Is Every ballot equal? In a recent effort contributed to Constitutional Democracies in Crisis? Sujit writes about a tweet from Eric Holder, Barrack Obama’s Attorney General. The tweet was published in late 2017.

The tweet defined the firing of Bob Mueller as an absolute red line. “If removed or meaningfully tampered with,” Eric Holder wrote. “There must be mass popular, peaceful support of both. The American people must be seen and heard,” he concluded.

On first glance it appears that Holder is calling for the people to not allow Trump to fire Mueller, but he clearly states there will be support from both sides. In the book, Sujit Choudhry breaks down his personal opinion on the tweet, but he also talks about the thought process of Eric Holder.

Choudhry’s chapter in Constitutional Democracies in Crisis? talks about two possible concepts that Holder could have been coming from (works.bepress.com).

The first possibility is a constitutional red line that is non-controversial and widely accepted by previous Presidents. This concept is based on what is allowed by the Constitution of the United States: Holder could have been saying that there are actual rules against a President firing a special investigation that is investigating the President.

The other concept that Holder could have been speaking about is civil unrest. He could have been merely stating that civilians are too involved with the investigation and neither side will buy the conclusion, no matter what is decided. If Trump fires Mueller, people could riot; If Mueller finds Trump guilty of a crime, people could riot. The red line could have been a symbol of the political divide in America.

Connect:  LinkedIn

Related Link:  http://sujitchoudhry.com/