Sujit Choudhry Applies His Expertise In Constitutional Law In Breaking Down Eric Holder’s Recent Tweet:

Center for Constitutional Transitions Director Sujit Choudhry is one of the world’s foremost experts in the realm of constitutional law. He originally hails from New Delhi, India and holds degrees from McGill University, Oxford, Harvard and the University of Toronto. Sujit Choudhry’s early career saw him working in the roles of law clerk for Canada’s Chief Justice Antonio Lamer. Sujit’s work in the field of constitutional law has seen him travel to over twenty different countries as a speaker on the topic, see These trips include speaker slots in the Middle East, Nepal, Ukraine and South Africa. His research is also noted for the broad scope of topics within the greater subject matter that it addresses ( The transitional process that takes place during the switch from authoritarian government to democracy is a major focus of Sujit Choudhry’s overall focus.

Sujit Choudhry has recently written a chapter that will be included in a book entitled Constitutional Democracies in Crisis? This chapter puts its focus on a troubling tweet that was put out in December 2017 by Eric Holder, the former Attorney General of the United States. The tweet from Holder revolved around the concept that terminating Special Counsel to the White House Robert Mueller would constitute a major red flag type of event. The suggestion made by Holder is that the American people should have the final say regarding the situation. Sujit Choudhry has gone into detail about the implications of Holder’s statement. He points out that Holder is trying to set a precedent that the American people will be the final say in how this issue is finally resolved. Sujit points out that Holder’s position in this matter is quite perplexing given that he is the former top official in American law enforcement. Sujit Choudhry goes into some detail about other similar situations that threaten constitutional democracy across the world and likens the situation in Poland regarding the PiS as being comparable to what Holder has been suggesting in the U.S. Sujit discusses at length the concern that governments that were democratically elected make use of legal methods in order to bend rules to stay in power in future cycles of election. His final point is that courts need to straightforwardly call out autocracy when it emerges in order to ensure that the people’s voices in democratic societies can continue to be heard.

Keep up with Choudhry on LinkedIn.

Related Link: